
Can you explain a little on how all MEP elements are calculated? A live example
MEP elements would typically be extracted directly from the MEP BIM model in the same way as shown in the video. However, unlike building elements, they are not split into individual materials. Instead, they are assigned using pieces.
This means the model export would include items such as pipes and ducts measured in metres, as well as equipment such as water tanks, heat recovery units, heat pumps, fans and other systems counted as individual pieces.
The list of equipment extracted from the BIM model would then be cross-checked against the MEP equipment schedules to ensure that all systems are included and nothing is missing. Once verified, the quantities are exported into One Click LCA following the same workflow demonstrated in the video.
Within One Click LCA, a relevant EPD is assigned to each item where available. If manufacturer-specific EPDs are not available in the database, we would request them directly from the manufacturer. If manufacturer EPDs are still not available, the most appropriate dataset is selected according to the EPD hierarchy. This approach ensures that the MEP systems are represented as accurately as possible.
How do you define the B6 & B7 which is not included in Onclick LCA
Operational energy (B6) is typically calculated outside One Click LCA. In line with RICS PS, operational energy should be modelled using TM54. Where TM54 modelling is not available (at early stages of design for example), SAP or SBEM results can be used for regulated energy, with unregulated energy estimated using relevant CIBSE guidance.
Operational water use (B7) is also calculated separately in accordance with Building Regulations Part G.
The resulting annual operational energy (B6) and water consumption (B7) values are then entered manually into the corresponding sections in One Click LCA so that they are included in the WLCA results.
What is the best way to start a WLCA using One-click? Would this be via BIM Model, or spreadsheets or the 3d carbon designer for creating first time WLCA for an as-built rather than improving a stage 2 or 4 assessment
It depends on the stage of design and the amount of information available at the time the WLCA is carried out. When only limited information is available, we would typically start with the 3D Carbon Designer. It is good for option testing, early planning WLCA, stages 1–2 feasibility. The model can then be refined as the design develops and more detailed information becomes available.
A full BIM model is usually available from around RIBA Stage 3 onwards. At this stage, quantities can be extracted directly from the model.
For post-construction or as-built assessments, we typically create a new carbon model using the final BIM models rather than continuing to modify the early-stage 3D Carbon Designer model. This ensures the assessment reflects the actual materials and systems installed in the building and provides a more reliable final WLCA.
Which is the most reliable benchmarking source available for WLCA results against different house types?
Benchmarks shouldn’t really be treated as “reliable” or “unreliable” in themselves. Different studies use different system boundaries, assumptions and calculation methods, so the numbers can vary quite a lot. What’s more important is using a consistent methodology so that results are comparable between projects. That’s why it’s best to reference benchmarks that follow the RICS PS approach, but they should be used as a guide for context rather than as a target that projects need to fit within.
Can I produce a Circular Economy Statement without completing the Whole Life Carbon Assessment?
Yes, but it depends on the purpose of the Circular Economy (CE) Statement.
If the CE Statement is being prepared to demonstrate compliance with GLA requirements, it will typically sit alongside a Whole Life Carbon Assessment (WLCA). The two assessments are closely related, as circular economy strategies (e.g. reuse of materials, design for disassembly, and longevity) can significantly influence the whole life carbon performance of a development. Preparing both together is therefore beneficial and often expected as part of a coordinated submission.
However, if the CE Statement is being produced to inform the design process or provide early-stage circular economy recommendations, it can be prepared without completing a WLCA. In this case, the statement would focus on strategies such as material efficiency, reuse, adaptability, and waste reduction, without necessarily quantifying the associated whole life carbon impacts.
Quality of MEP Revit models can vary, so we address this through a combination of early review and cross-checking with other design information. To ensure accuracy we always review the MEP model alongside equipment schedules and technical specifications. If something doesn’t align, we flag it early and clarify with the design team.
We often work closely with our parent company, Cooper Homewood, who are MEP consultants and primarily design in Revit. Because we collaborate regularly, the models we receive are generally well structured and suitable for extracting quantities for Whole Life Carbon assessments. When preparing a fee proposal, we also review the expected quality and level of detail of the MEP BIM models. This helps us determine whether they can be used directly for carbon take-offs or whether alternative approaches may be more appropriate.
Do I need to be proficient in Revit to extract the information needed for the assessment?
No, you don’t need to be highly proficient in Revit to extract the information required for a Whole Life Carbon Assessment.
A basic understanding of how to navigate the model and access element data is usually sufficient to review systems and extract the relevant quantities. The process typically involves reviewing object properties, filtering categories and exporting schedules, rather than carrying out detailed modelling work.
If more complex queries arise, our BIM technicians at Cooper Homewood are always available to provide guidance, training, or share tips on how to navigate the model efficiently. This collaborative approach ensures the necessary information can be extracted reliably without requiring advanced Revit expertise.
It depends on the stage of design and the amount of information available at the time the WLCA is carried out. When only limited information is available, we would typically start with the 3D Carbon Designer. It is good for option testing, early planning WLCA, stages 1–2 feasibility. The model can then be refined as the design develops and more detailed information becomes available.
A full BIM model is usually available from around RIBA Stage 3 onwards. At this stage, quantities can be extracted directly from the model.
For post-construction or as-built assessments, we typically create a new carbon model using the final BIM models rather than continuing to modify the early-stage 3D Carbon Designer model. This ensures the assessment reflects the actual materials and systems installed in the building and provides a more reliable final WLCA.
Watch the video to gain critical insights into Whole Life Carbon Assessments.
_1770806552.png)
Whole Life Carbon Assessments
To ensure that global temperature rise stays within the 2-degree limit set by the Paris Agreement, designers must extend their focus beyond operational energy to also address embodied carbon.
Both the RICS Professional Statement and the London Plan prioritise this aspect of carbon reduction efforts.
Now, for large-scale developments in London, Whole Life Carbon Assessments (LCA) and Circular Economy Statements are mandatory.
LCA considers every step from raw material extraction through manufacturing, distribution, use, and eventual disposal.
Conducting an LCA allows you to showcase reduced environmental impacts by:
The RICS Guidance offers a standardised, science-based methodology for quantifying the lifetime environmental impact of development projects.
We utilise One Click LCA (endorsed by the GLA) to help you meet local and regional requirements. We can compile compliant Whole Life Carbon and Circular Economy Statements to support your development scheme.
With One Click LCA, we guide you through all submission stages, from pre-application to post-construction, facilitating the transition to a holistic carbon approach.
Using this platform enables us to conduct a comprehensive life cycle assessment of the entire building quickly, pinpointing areas requiring action and helping you demonstrate your sustainability credentials to relevant authorities effectively.
Part L - Photographic Evidence
Did you know that photographic documentation has become a pivotal aspect of ensuring compliance with the latest Building Regulations Part L 2021?
This recent requirement marks a significant shift in the construction industry’s approach to verifying adherence to energy efficiency standards.
Under Building Regulations Part L 2021, photographic evidence is now mandated for all newly constructed dwellings undergoing assessment. However, it’s essential to note that this requirement doesn’t extend to non-residential buildings, conversions, or extensions, which are exempt from this provision.
The primary objective behind this mandate is multifaceted. Firstly, it serves to meticulously document the construction processes of each dwelling, offering a comprehensive visual record of the various stages from foundation to completion. This documentation not only provides transparency but also aids in quality assurance, ensuring that every aspect of construction aligns with the original design specifications.
Moreover, the inclusion of photographic evidence is instrumental in identifying any deviations or discrepancies that may arise during the construction phase. By capturing these deviations in real-time, stakeholders can promptly address and rectify any issues, thereby upholding the integrity of the project and minimising potential risks.
Furthermore, the requirement for photographic evidence plays an important role in updating energy modeling to accurately reflect the finished building. By visually documenting key energy efficiency features, such as insulation installations, air sealing measures, and renewable energy systems, stakeholders can enhance the precision of energy performance assessments and ensure compliance with regulatory standards.
Navigating these evolving requirements can be daunting amidst the myriad of changes occurring within the construction industry.
Daylight and sunlight
In the pursuit of creating healthy, sustainable, and visually appealing built environments, architects and designers are increasingly prioritising the integration of natural light into their projects.
Daylight, sunlight, and overshadowing play crucial roles in shaping the quality of indoor and outdoor spaces, influencing everything from occupant comfort and well-being to energy efficiency and architectural aesthetics. Let’s delve into these concepts to understand their significance in building design.
Daylight refers to the natural light that enters a building through windows, skylights, or other openings, illuminating interior spaces. Beyond its practical function of providing illumination, daylight has profound impacts on human health, productivity, and mood. Exposure to natural light has been linked to improved concentration, enhanced circadian rhythms, and reduced symptoms of Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD).
In architectural design, maximising daylight penetration is key to creating inviting, visually stimulating interiors. Strategies such as orienting buildings to optimise solar exposure, incorporating large windows and glazed facades, and using reflective surfaces to distribute light can help harness the benefits of daylighting while minimising the need for artificial lighting.
Sunlight, specifically direct sunlight, plays a dual role in building design: it provides natural illumination and serves as a renewable energy source through solar gain. By strategically positioning windows, solar panels, and shading devices, architects can harness sunlight to optimise both daylighting and energy performance.
Sunlight analysis tools allow designers to predict and visualise the path of the sun throughout the day and across seasons, informing decisions about building orientation, window placement, and shading strategies. By balancing the desire for ample natural light with the need to mitigate solar heat gain, architects can create comfortable, energy-efficient spaces that benefit both occupants and the environment.
While maximising natural light is desirable, it’s essential to consider the potential for overshadowing, where adjacent buildings or landscape features block sunlight from reaching certain areas. Overshadowing can have significant implications for building design, affecting everything from daylight availability to solar panel performance.
Through careful site analysis and planning, architects can minimise overshadowing by optimising building massing, height, and orientation. Techniques such as setback and step-backs, building setbacks, and the strategic placement of taller buildings can help mitigate overshadowing effects while preserving access to natural light and views.
Daylight, sunlight, and overshadowing are integral considerations in architectural design, influencing the quality, functionality, and sustainability of built environments. By harnessing the power of natural light, architects can create spaces that promote well-being, enhance visual comfort, and minimise reliance on artificial lighting and mechanical heating and cooling systems.
As stewards of sustainable design, architects have a responsibility to prioritise daylighting strategies that optimise energy performance, enhance occupant comfort, and foster connections to the natural environment. By integrating daylight, sunlight, and overshadowing considerations into their design processes, architects can unlock the full potential of natural light to create buildings that are both aesthetically pleasing and environmentally responsible.
Futura Bright brochure